Student Highlights Irregularities in CBSE Tender Process for On-Screen Marking System
Sarthak Sidhant, a student from Ranchi, gained national attention after investigating irregularities in the Central Board of Secondary Education's (CBSE) tender process for its On-Screen Marking (OSM) system. His blog highlighted alleged rule changes favoring the vendor Coempt EduTeck, prompting CBSE to remove the company from the re-evaluation process while maintaining timelines. Sidhant presented his findings before a parliamentary committee, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in public contracting.
First-hand measurement across 2 sources
We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. Coverage leans balanced overall (Left 40%, Centre 55%, Right 5%). Overall sentiment is neutral (48/100). Lens Score 39/100 — moderate-to-low public interest.
Outlets analysed (first-hand measurement by TBN's Bias Engine):
- thetribune— left-leaning framing, neutral sentiment
- thetelegraph— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
AI Analysis
The articles primarily present the perspective of Sarthak Sidhant, a student and investigator, focusing on alleged procedural issues within CBSE's tendering. The coverage includes CBSE's response but does not heavily feature government or opposition political viewpoints. The framing centers on transparency and accountability concerns without partisan framing, reflecting a focus on institutional scrutiny rather than political debate.
The overall tone is investigative and critical, highlighting concerns about transparency and fairness in CBSE's procurement process. However, it remains factual and measured, emphasizing Sidhant's role and CBSE's subsequent actions without sensationalism. The sentiment is mixed, combining critique of the tender irregularities with acknowledgment of corrective steps taken by CBSE.