
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has denied claims of irregularities in scanning Class 12 answer sheets under its On-Screen Marking (OSM) system, calling such reports "factually incorrect" and affirming that all evaluation stages were conducted under strict supervision and established protocols. However, students and some teachers have raised concerns over blurred scanned copies, portal glitches, and payment issues, questioning the clarity and fairness of the digital evaluation process. CBSE urges reliance on official sources and highlights safeguards ensuring transparency and accuracy.
The article group presents perspectives primarily from the CBSE as the official authority defending its digital evaluation system, alongside student and teacher voices expressing concerns about technical issues. Coverage includes institutional assurances of procedural integrity and transparency, balanced with reports of user difficulties and demands for system review. The framing remains focused on procedural facts without partisan or political framing.
The overall sentiment is mixed, combining CBSE's firm rebuttals and confidence in the OSM system with student and educator frustrations over blurred scans and technical problems. While official statements emphasize fairness and accuracy, the reported user experiences introduce a critical tone, reflecting public dissatisfaction and calls for improvements in the evaluation process.
Each source's own headline, political lean, and sentiment — so you can see framing differences at a glance.
english broke this story on 20 May, 05:23 am. Other outlets followed.
Well-covered story — coverage matches public importance.
TBN's analysis identified the following accountability dimensions in this story.
This story points to a failure in institutional processes — regulation, safety, oversight, or service delivery breaking down at scale.
Institutions and figures named across source coverage.
Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.