
The Allahabad High Court has issued detailed guidelines under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, allowing criminal trials to proceed in absentia for proclaimed offenders evading arrest. Justice Praveen Kumar Giri described this as a landmark provision introducing 'trial in absentia' in India. The procedure mandates issuing at least two arrest warrants, a 90-day waiting period after framing charges, public notices, and providing state-appointed legal counsel if needed. Evidence and witness testimonies must be recorded via audio-video means to ensure transparency.
The articles present a legal development focused on procedural guidelines without evident political framing. Both sources emphasize the judiciary's role in implementing the BNSS provisions, highlighting the court's efforts to expedite justice. There is no partisan commentary or political interpretation, reflecting a neutral presentation centered on legal processes and rights protections.
The tone across the articles is neutral and informative, focusing on the procedural aspects of the new trial guidelines. The coverage neither praises nor criticizes the provision but highlights its significance as a legal innovation. The sentiment is balanced, emphasizing transparency and fairness measures without emotional or evaluative language.
Each source's own headline, political lean, and sentiment — so you can see framing differences at a glance.
| Source | Their headline | Bias | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|
| hindustantimes | Allahabad HC issues guidelines for 'trial in absentia' under BNSS | Center | Neutral |
| news18 | Allahabad HC issues guidelines for 'trial in absentia' under BNSS | Center | Neutral |
news18 broke this story on 7 May, 04:30 pm. Other outlets followed.
Well-covered story — coverage matches public importance.
Institutions and figures named across source coverage.
Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.