
The Delhi High Court has again deferred the appointment of amicus curiae to represent former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, and AAP leader Durgesh Pathak in the CBI's appeal against their discharge in the excise policy case. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma did not hold court for the second time in a week, awaiting consent from proposed senior advocates. Kejriwal and others have boycotted proceedings, citing unresolved concerns after the judge refused to recuse herself.
The articles primarily present the procedural developments in the Delhi High Court regarding the excise policy case involving AAP leaders. They include perspectives from the judiciary and the AAP leaders, particularly their decision to boycott proceedings due to apprehensions about the judge. The coverage focuses on legal processes without endorsing any political viewpoint, reflecting a neutral stance on the dispute.
The tone across the articles is neutral and factual, focusing on court proceedings and official communications. There is no emotive language or judgment expressed about the parties involved. The reporting highlights delays and procedural aspects without positive or negative framing, resulting in a balanced and objective sentiment.
Each source's own headline, political lean, and sentiment — so you can see framing differences at a glance.
| Source | Their headline | Bias | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|
| hindustantimes | Appointment of amicus for Kejriwal, Sisodia deferred again | Left | Neutral |
| hindustantimes | Excise case: Appointment of amicus curiae by Delhi HC for Kejriwal, Sisodia delayed | Left | Neutral |
hindustantimes broke this story on 11 May, 10:38 am. Other outlets followed.
Story is receiving appropriate media attention relative to public interest.
Institutions and figures named across source coverage.
Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.