Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Co-founder Challenges CULT Trademark Ownership Ahead of Cult.fit IPO

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Business

Co-founder Challenges CULT Trademark Ownership Ahead of Cult.fit IPO

Analysed 12 Nov 2026·2 sources analysed·Bangalore, India·Business
Co-founder Challenges CULT Trademark Ownership Ahead of Cult.fit IPOPreviousNext

Deepak Poduval, co-founder of the CULT fitness brand, has filed legal petitions challenging the trademark registration held by Cultfit Healthcare Pvt Ltd, a Cult.fit subsidiary. He alleges that the 2017 documents transferring trademark rights contain forged signatures. The Madras High Court issued a notice on the trademark cancellation petition and adjourned the hearing to December 2, 2026. Separately, the Commercial Court in Bengaluru will hear the case on November 16. Cult.fit denies the forgery allegations amid its planned IPO.

Sentiment
49%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (49/100). Lens Score 56/100.

Outlets measured: economictimes, inc42media. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 12 Nov 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (49/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (48–50/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

inc42media broke this story on 11 Nov, 10:43 am. Other outlets followed.

11 Nov, 10:43 am2 sources · 18 h12 Nov, 05:12 am
  1. 1
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byMrunal Wange· Business & Economy Editor· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Japan and Andhra Pradesh Discuss Rare Earth Minerals and Investment Cooperation
Next →
Dalal Street Sees Gains in Lemon Tree Hotels, MIDHANI, Adani; Aurobindo Pharma Declines
inc42media11 Nov, 10:43 am
IPO-Bound Cult.fit Faces Fresh Legal Challenge Over CULT Trademark
  • 2
    economictimes12 Nov, 05:12 am
    CULT trademark under legal cloud as co-founder seeks cancellation ahead of Cult.fit IPO
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Madras High CourtKarnataka High CourtCommercial Court BengaluruSecurities and Exchange Board of India
    Corporate
    Cultfit Healthcare Private LimitedCult.fit LimitedCult Fitness Private Limited
    Enforcement
    Bellandur Police Station
    Judiciary
    Madras High CourtKarnataka High CourtCommercial Court Bengaluru

    Story context

    Category
    Business
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    12 Nov 2026
    Key entities
    TrademarkBangaloreRectification (law)Madras High CourtSubsidiaryProspectus (finance)Initial public offeringSecurities and Exchange Board of IndiaForgeryPhysical fitnessFirst information reportIntellectual property