Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
NCLAT Rules Gratuity and Leave Encashment Not Part of CIRP Costs

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Business

NCLAT Rules Gratuity and Leave Encashment Not Part of CIRP Costs

Analysed 20 Jul 2026·2 sources analysed·Kolkata, India·Business
NCLAT Rules Gratuity and Leave Encashment Not Part of CIRP CostsPreviousNext

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed an appeal by a former employee of Duncans Industries seeking priority payment of gratuity and leave encashment dues as insolvency resolution process (IRP) costs. Upholding the earlier National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order, the tribunal clarified that such dues are terminal benefits and must be settled according to the company's approved resolution plan, not as IRP costs under Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Sentiment
50%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (50/100). Lens Score 51/100.

Outlets measured: economictimes, news18. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 20 Jul 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (50/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–50/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

news18 broke this story on 20 Jul, 03:33 pm. Other outlets followed.

20 Jul, 03:33 pm2 sources · 4 h20 Jul, 07:49 pm
  1. 1
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byMrunal Wange· Business & Economy Editor· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
NRIs in US and Singapore Face Withholding Tax Concerns on FCNR Deposit Schemes
Next →
BMC Plans Rs 2,241 Crore Water Tunnel Contract to Connect Manori Desalination Plant
news1820 Jul, 03:33 pm
Gratuity, leave encashment not part of CIRP cost: NCLAT
  • 2
    economictimes20 Jul, 07:49 pm
    Gratuity, leave encashment not part of CIRP cost: NCLAT
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    National Company Law Appellate TribunalNational Company Law Tribunal
    Corporate
    Resolution ProfessionalDuncans Industries
    Judiciary
    National Company Law Appellate TribunalNational Company Law Tribunal

    Story context

    Category
    Business
    Location
    Kolkata, India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    20 Jul 2026
    Key entities
    National Company Law TribunalInsolvencyAppellate courtKolkataNew DelhiNational Company Law Appellate TribunalInsolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016LiquidationCreditorLakhStatuteIndian rupee