Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Courts Address Copyright Issues in AI Training by Anthropic and OpenAI

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Business

Courts Address Copyright Issues in AI Training by Anthropic and OpenAI

Analysed 28 Jul 2026·2 sources analysed·San Francisco, United States·Business
Courts Address Copyright Issues in AI Training by Anthropic and OpenAIPreviousNext

Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement with authors who accused it of using pirated books to train its AI model Claude, following a 2025 court ruling that AI training on books constitutes fair use. Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court issued an interim judgment allowing OpenAI to use copyrighted content to train ChatGPT under India's fair dealing provisions, highlighting ongoing legal debates over copyright and AI training globally. Both cases reflect evolving judicial approaches to AI and copyright law.

Sentiment
60%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (60/100). Lens Score 45/100.

Outlets measured: indianexpress, businessstandard. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 28 Jul 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (60/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (55–65/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

businessstandard broke this story on 28 Jul, 10:19 am. Other outlets followed.

28 Jul, 10:19 am2 sources · 3 h28 Jul, 01:01 pm
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byMrunal Wange· Business & Economy Editor· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Visa Announces 2,600 Job Cuts to Streamline Operations and Focus on Growth
Next →
El Niño and Monsoon Variability Pose Inflation and Growth Risks for India’s Economy
1
businessstandard28 Jul, 10:19 am
How Anthropic ended up paying 1.5 bn for training Claude on pirated books
  • 2
    indianexpress28 Jul, 01:01 pm
    Is training an AI model 'public interest'? Delhi HC verdict goes to heart of copyright debate
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal TradeUS District Court
    Corporate
    AnthropicOpenAIISBNdb
    Judiciary
    US District Judge William AlsupDelhi High Court

    Story context

    Category
    Business
    Location
    San Francisco, United States
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    28 Jul 2026
    Key entities
    Artificial intelligenceLawsuitIndian rupeeOpenAIAnthropicLarge language modelSettlement (litigation)Copyright infringementLibrary GenesisFair useMeta PlatformsOnline piracy