Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Delhi Court Permanently Restrains Pharmaceutical Firm from Using 'Udaan' Trademark

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Business

Delhi Court Permanently Restrains Pharmaceutical Firm from Using 'Udaan' Trademark

Analysed 23 Aug 2026·2 sources analysed·Delhi, India·Business
Delhi Court Permanently Restrains Pharmaceutical Firm from Using 'Udaan' TrademarkPreviousNext

A Delhi court has permanently restrained Hyderabad-based Sainus Pharmaceutical Private Limited from using the trademark 'Udaan' or any similar mark, ruling it infringed on RSPL Health Private Limited's registered 'Udan' trademark. RSPL Health, known for its 'Ghari' detergent brand, had registered 'Udan' in 2007 for sanitary napkins. The court found Sainus Pharma's use of 'Udaan' to be identical and deceptively similar, noting the defendant did not contest the case, leading to a permanent injunction against the pharmaceutical firm.

Sentiment
50%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (50/100). Lens Score 42/100.

Outlets measured: economictimes, news18. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 23 Aug 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (50/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–50/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

news18 broke this story on 23 Aug, 12:01 pm. Other outlets followed.

23 Aug, 12:01 pm2 sources · 12 min23 Aug, 12:14 pm
  1. 1
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byMrunal Wange· Business & Economy Editor· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Health Ministry Requires Sterilisation Facility Licence Disclosure on Medical Device Labels
Next →
India's Art Market Expands with Record Sales and Emerging Regional Collectors
news1823 Aug, 12:01 pm
Udan vs Udaan: Delhi court restrains pharmaceutical firm from using 'Udaan' mark
  • 2
    economictimes23 Aug, 12:14 pm
    Udan vs Udaan: Delhi court restrains pharmaceutical firm from using 'Udaan' mark
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    District Court of Delhi
    Corporate
    Sainus Pharmaceutical Private LimitedRSPL Health Private Limited
    Judiciary
    Delhi District CourtDistrict Court of Delhi

    Story context

    Category
    Business
    Location
    Delhi, India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    23 Aug 2026
    Key entities
    Privately held companyTrademarkDelhiPharmaceutical industryDefendantPlaintiffNew DelhiDistrictPropertyBengali MarketGole MarketChanakyapuri