Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
ITAT Allows Taxpayer to Challenge Rs 90 Lakh Penalty Over Property Sale

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Business

ITAT Allows Taxpayer to Challenge Rs 90 Lakh Penalty Over Property Sale

Analysed 12 Oct 2026·2 sources analysed·Pune, India·Business
ITAT Allows Taxpayer to Challenge Rs 90 Lakh Penalty Over Property SalePreviousNext

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune, has allowed taxpayer Gnyanoba Dagadu Masurkar to contest a Rs 90.09 lakh penalty imposed for failing to file an income tax return after selling property in 2015-16. The tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals, set aside earlier dismissal orders, and sent the case back for fresh consideration. However, it did not cancel the penalty or the Rs 2.65 crore capital gains addition. The ruling underscores the importance of timely tax compliance and responding to department notices.

Sentiment
51%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (51/100). Lens Score 47/100.

Outlets measured: mint, thefinancialexpress. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 12 Oct 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (51/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–52/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

thefinancialexpress broke this story on 12 Oct, 02:04 pm. Other outlets followed.

12 Oct, 02:04 pm2 sources · 4 h12 Oct, 05:48 pm
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byMrunal Wange· Business & Economy Editor· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
RBI Introduces New Rules to Regulate Rupee Speculation and Hedging Decisions
Next →
GST Council Limits Vehicle Inspections to Origin and Destination States for High-Value Goods
1
thefinancialexpress12 Oct, 02:04 pm
Man sells property, skips ITR filing, faces Rs 90 lakh penalty: Here's what ITAT said
  • 2
    mint12 Oct, 05:48 pm
    Sold property but did not file ITR? ITAT gives taxpayer another chance to contest 90.09 lakh income tax penalty Mint
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Income Tax Appellate TribunalCommissioner of Income Tax AppealsIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, PuneIncome Tax Department

    Story context

    Category
    Business
    Location
    Pune, India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    12 Oct 2026
    Key entities
    TribunalTax return (United States)Capital gainLakhIncome taxCroreIndian rupeePuneIncome Tax Appellate TribunalSupreme Court of the United StatesAdjudicationProcedural law