Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Bombay High Court Limits DNA Testing in Paternity Dispute to Last Resort

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Crime

Bombay High Court Limits DNA Testing in Paternity Dispute to Last Resort

Analysed 24 Sept 2026·2 sources analysed·Nashik, India·Crime
Bombay High Court Limits DNA Testing in Paternity Dispute to Last ResortPreviousNext

The Bombay High Court overturned a 2018 Nashik civil court order that mandated DNA testing in a paternity dispute involving a 19-year-old claiming inheritance as the illegitimate son of a deceased hotelier. Justice Sandeep Marne ruled that DNA tests should not be ordered routinely but only after parties present sufficient evidence and when scientific testing is necessary to resolve the case. The claimant may seek DNA testing later if evidence alone is insufficient to decide the matter.

Sentiment
50%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (50/100). Lens Score 46/100.

Outlets measured: hindustantimes, freepressjournal. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 24 Sept 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (50/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–50/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

freepressjournal broke this story on 23 Sept, 09:17 pm. Other outlets followed.

23 Sept, 09:17 pm2 sources · 5 h24 Sept, 02:28 am
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byDushyant Deshmukh· Investigative Writer· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Body of Missing AAP Sarpanch's Husband Found; Murder Case Registered
Next →
Police Investigate Kanpur Trader Vineet Minocha's Murder, Arrest Son Subrat
1
freepressjournal23 Sept, 09:17 pm
'Testing Cannot Be Ordered As Routine': Bombay HC Sets Aside DNA Test Order In Paternity Dispute
  • 2
    hindustantimes24 Sept, 02:28 am
    DNA test for ascertaining paternity must be ordered as a last resort: HC
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Regional Forensic Science LaboratoryBombay High CourtJoint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nashik
    Judiciary
    Supreme Court of IndiaBombay High CourtJoint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nashik

    Story context

    Category
    Crime
    Location
    Nashik, India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    24 Sept 2026
    Key entities
    Genetic testingBombay High CourtParentLegitimacy (family law)Civil law (common law)NashikHigh Court of JusticePlaintiffMumbaiMarne (department)DNACourt order