NTA Faces Criticism Over Repeated Questions and Errors in UGC NET 2026 Exam
The National Testing Agency (NTA) faces criticism over the 2026 UGC NET exam after reports revealed 67 repeated questions in the English Paper II from the 2024 exam, raising concerns about exam integrity and quality control. Additionally, Sociology candidates reported multiple spelling errors, incorrect scholar names, and translation issues. Academics and students have questioned the NTA's scrutiny process, highlighting potential unfair advantages for coaching students and calling for accountability. The NTA's official response is awaited.
First-hand measurement across 2 sources
We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. Coverage leans balanced overall (Left 38%, Centre 58%, Right 4%). Overall sentiment is negative (28/100). Lens Score 32/100 — low public interest.
Outlets analysed (first-hand measurement by TBN's Bias Engine):
- indiatoday— balanced framing, negative sentiment
- thetelegraph— left-leaning framing, negative sentiment
AI Analysis
The articles primarily present critical perspectives on the NTA's handling of the UGC NET exam, reflecting concerns from academics, students, and education experts. While some sources emphasize administrative shortcomings and call for accountability, there is limited representation of the NTA's viewpoint, which remains pending. The coverage focuses on institutional critique without partisan framing or political party involvement.
The overall tone across the articles is critical and concerned, highlighting issues of exam quality, fairness, and administrative oversight. Student frustration and academic disapproval are prominent, with calls for improved standards. However, the sentiment remains factual and restrained, avoiding sensationalism, and notes that official responses are still awaited, indicating an ongoing situation.
