Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
India Kanoon Challenges Delhi High Court's 'Right to Be Forgotten' Ruling

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics

India Kanoon Challenges Delhi High Court's 'Right to Be Forgotten' Ruling

Analysed 15 Jul 2026·4 sources analysed·India·Politics
India Kanoon Challenges Delhi High Court's 'Right to Be Forgotten' RulingPreviousNext

India Kanoon has challenged a May 29 Delhi High Court ruling that recognized the 'right to be forgotten,' directing de-indexing and disabling of name-based searches for certain judicial records. The platform argues the judgment's broad standards on relevance and public interest undermine open justice and freedom of information. The court has scheduled further hearings for July 21. Separately, concerns have been raised about the ruling's impact on media freedom and increased privacy litigation risks for journalists in India.

TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 4 sources

We measured how 4 outlets covered this story. Coverage leans balanced overall (Left 12%, Centre 83%, Right 5%). Overall sentiment is neutral (46/100). Lens Score 31/100 — low public interest.

Outlets analysed (first-hand measurement by TBN's Bias Engine):

  • hindustantimes— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
  • thehindu— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
  • newslaundry— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
  • news18— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
Political Bias
12%83%5%
Sentiment
46%
AI analysis of 4 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 15 Jul 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Political bias across 4 sources
● Left 12%● Center 83%● Right 5%

The article group presents perspectives from legal and media stakeholders, including India Kanoon's challenge to the Delhi High Court's ruling and concerns from journalistic circles about privacy litigation. The coverage reflects a balance between judicial developments emphasizing privacy rights and critiques highlighting potential impacts on transparency and press freedom, without favoring any political ideology.

Sentiment — Neutral (46/100)

The overall tone across the articles is cautious and critical, focusing on the legal and practical implications of the court's ruling. While the judgment is presented as a significant development in privacy law, sources express concern about its broad application and possible chilling effects on media and public access to information, resulting in a mixed but predominantly concerned sentiment.

How 4 sources covered this story

Reviewed byPrajakta Kale· Political Analyst· Edited byOjas Kale
← Previous
Karnataka Lokayukta Seeks Governor's Approval to Prosecute MLA Zameer Ahmed Khan
Next →
Karnataka Begins Permanent Resident Certificate Applications Amid Electoral Roll Revision

Each source's own headline, political lean, and sentiment — so you can see framing differences at a glance.

SourceTheir headlineBiasSentiment
hindustantimesIndian Kanoon moves HC against de-indexing orderCenterNeutral
thehinduIndia Kanoon challenges Delhi HC ruling recognising 'right to be forgotten', says it undermines open justiceCenterNeutral
newslaundryScrubbed and sued: The Delhi High Court's two-pronged attack on journalismCenterNeutral
news18India Kanoon moves Delhi HC against 'right to be forgotten' decisionCenterNeutral

Coverage timeline

news18 broke this story on 14 Jul, 07:46 am. Other outlets followed.

  1. 1
    news1814 Jul, 07:46 am
    India Kanoon moves Delhi HC against 'right to be forgotten' decision
  2. 2
    newslaundry14 Jul, 10:01 am
    Scrubbed and sued: The Delhi High Court's two-pronged attack on journalism
  3. 3
    thehindu14 Jul, 11:17 am
    India Kanoon challenges Delhi HC ruling recognising 'right to be forgotten', says it undermines open justice
  4. 4
    hindustantimes15 Jul, 02:43 am
    Indian Kanoon moves HC against de-indexing order

Lens Score breakdown

31/100
Public interest0/100
Coverage gap100%

Well-covered story — coverage matches public importance.

Who's involved

Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

Government
Delhi High CourtSupreme Court of India
Corporate
Search EnginesTV Today NetworkIKanoon Software Development Pvt Ltd
Judiciary
Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtSupreme Court of India

Story context

Category
Politics
Location
India
Sources analysed
4
Last analysed
15 Jul 2026
Key entities
Right to be forgottenIndiaSearch engineDelhi High CourtChief Justice of the United StatesRight to privacyFundamental rightsAcquittalSupreme Court of the United StatesLawsuitPrivacyDatabase