NSUI Challenges CBSE's On-Screen Marking System in Delhi High Court Over Evaluation Concerns
The National Students' Union of India (NSUI) has petitioned the Delhi High Court challenging the Central Board of Secondary Education's (CBSE) On-Screen Marking (OSM) system for Class 12 exams. The NSUI alleges technical flaws such as blurred scans, missing pages, and low marks, claiming these issues have affected students' results. The petition seeks a fresh verification window, physical rechecking of answer sheets, and an independent probe into the digital evaluation process, citing widespread concerns from students, parents, and teachers.
First-hand measurement across 2 sources
We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. Coverage leans left-leaning overall (Left 70%, Centre 30%, Right 0%). Overall sentiment is neutral (35/100). Lens Score 35/100 — moderate-to-low public interest.
Outlets analysed (first-hand measurement by TBN's Bias Engine):
- timesnow— left-leaning framing, neutral sentiment
- freepressjournal— left-leaning framing, neutral sentiment
AI Analysis
The articles primarily present the NSUI's perspective, a student organization linked to a political party, highlighting allegations against CBSE's digital evaluation system. The coverage focuses on the petition's claims without including CBSE's response or other viewpoints, reflecting a narrative centered on the students' grievances and legal action.
The tone across the articles is critical of the CBSE's On-Screen Marking system, emphasizing reported technical issues and dissatisfaction among students and stakeholders. While the sentiment is largely negative regarding the evaluation process, it remains factual and restrained, focusing on the legal challenge and concerns raised rather than emotive language.
How 2 sources covered this story
Each source's own headline, political lean, and sentiment — so you can see framing differences at a glance.