Supreme Court Seeks Government Response on CBSE's On-Screen Marking System Issues
The Supreme Court expressed concern over students' frustration with the Central Board of Secondary Education's (CBSE) On-Screen Marking (OSM) digital evaluation system for Class 12 exams. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant noted systemic issues and sought the assistance of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. The government informed the court that a one-member commission, headed by S. Radha Chauhan, is reviewing the evaluation process and recommending reforms. The court requested a status report and scheduled further hearings.
First-hand measurement across 10 sources
We measured how 10 outlets covered this story. Coverage leans balanced overall (Left 10%, Centre 86%, Right 4%). Overall sentiment is neutral (44/100). Lens Score 37/100 — moderate-to-low public interest.
Outlets analysed (first-hand measurement by TBN's Bias Engine):
- thestatesman— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- thetribune— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- thehindu— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- ndtv— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- timesnow— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- indiatoday— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- businessstandard— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- hindustantimes— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
AI Analysis
The article group presents a judicial perspective focused on student concerns and systemic issues within the CBSE's digital evaluation system. It includes government responses emphasizing ongoing reviews and reforms without adversarial framing. The coverage reflects institutional viewpoints—judiciary seeking accountability and government assuring corrective measures—without partisan commentary or political positioning.
The overall tone across the articles is concerned yet constructive, highlighting student frustration while underscoring efforts by authorities to address the problems. The sentiment is balanced, combining acknowledgment of challenges with official commitments to reform, avoiding sensationalism or undue criticism.
How 10 sources covered this story
Each source's own headline, political lean, and sentiment — so you can see framing differences at a glance.