Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
ADR Report Finds 191 Candidates with Criminal Cases Lacked Party Disclosure in 2026 Elections

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics

ADR Report Finds 191 Candidates with Criminal Cases Lacked Party Disclosure in 2026 Elections

Analysed 11 Sept 2026·3 sources analysed·Assam, India·Politics
ADR Report Finds 191 Candidates with Criminal Cases Lacked Party Disclosure in 2026 ElectionsPreviousNext

An ADR report found that political parties failed to disclose reasons for selecting 191 candidates with criminal cases in the 2026 Assembly elections across Assam, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and Puducherry, as mandated by the Supreme Court's Format C7. While parties provided disclosures for most candidates, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry had the highest non-compliance. The BJP and Congress omitted details for several candidates, whereas the Trinamool Congress fully complied. Some parties used repetitive explanations for candidate selection despite criminal backgrounds.

Political Bias
18%69%13%
Sentiment
37%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 3 sources

We measured how 3 outlets covered this story. Coverage leans balanced overall (Left 18%, Centre 69%, Right 13%). Overall sentiment is negative (37/100). Lens Score 64/100.

Outlets measured: thetelegraph, thehindu, deccanherald. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 3 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 11 Sept 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Political bias across 3 sources
● Left 18%● Center 69%● Right 13%

All 3 outlets scored close to centre on political lean. The real divergence here is in emphasis, not lean — compare the headlines below to see how each outlet chose to frame the same facts.

Sentiment — Negative (37/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (28–48/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

deccanherald broke this story on 11 Sept, 01:05 pm. Other outlets followed.

11 Sept, 01:05 pm3 sources · 60 min11 Sept, 02:05 pm
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byPrajakta Kale· Political Analyst· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Dispute Over Full Vande Mataram Rendition Causes Uproar at Palakkad Council Meeting
Next →
Alice Weidel Leads AfD After Historic Vote in Saxony-Anhalt State Election
  1. 1
    deccanherald11 Sept, 01:05 pm
    Parties fail to disclose reasons for 191 criminal-tainted candidates: ADR report
  2. 2
    thehindu11 Sept, 02:01 pm
    Parties failed to publish details of 191 candidates with criminal records in 2026 Assembly polls: ADR report
  3. 3
    thetelegraph11 Sept, 02:05 pm
    ADR: Parties gave no reason for choosing 191 candidates facing criminal for cases five state

Who's involved

Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

Government
Election Commission of IndiaSupreme Court of India
Political
Tamizhaga Vazhvu KatchiCommunist Party of India (Marxist)Dravida Munnetra KazhagamBharatiya Janata PartyPattali Makkal KatchiIndian Secular FrontTrinamool CongressGana Suraksha PartyTamil Maanila CongressAll India United Democratic FrontIndian National CongressAll India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
Judiciary
Supreme Court of India

Story context

Category
Politics
Location
Assam, India
Sources analysed
3
Last analysed
11 Sept 2026
Key entities
Puducherry (union territory)AssamTamil NaduWest BengalSupreme Court of IndiaDravida Munnetra KazhagamBharatiya Janata PartyPolitical partyAll India Anna Dravida Munnetra KazhagamIndian National CongressKeralaTrinamool Congress