Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Delhi High Court to Hear Appeals on Name-Based Search Restrictions for Legal Database

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics

Delhi High Court to Hear Appeals on Name-Based Search Restrictions for Legal Database

Analysed 19 Aug 2026·2 sources analysed·India·Politics
Delhi High Court to Hear Appeals on Name-Based Search Restrictions for Legal DatabasePreviousNext

The Delhi High Court is set to hear appeals by legal database India Kanoon against a single judge's order that restricts name-based searches on its platform, citing the 'right to be forgotten.' The bench emphasized that name-based searches are essential for accessing judgments and serve the public interest. India Kanoon argued that the order hampers effective access to judicial records, while opponents stressed privacy concerns for individuals previously accused in cases. The court will consider these competing interests on September 2.

Sentiment
51%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (51/100). Lens Score 50/100.

Outlets measured: indianexpress, hindustantimes. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 19 Aug 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (51/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–52/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

hindustantimes broke this story on 19 Aug, 08:34 am. Other outlets followed.

19 Aug, 08:34 am2 sources · 48 min19 Aug, 09:22 am
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byPrajakta Kale· Political Analyst· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Iran Warns Gulf States Against Assisting US Military Operations
Next →
Meghalaya Cabinet Approves Amendments to Align Private Universities with UGC Norms
1
hindustantimes19 Aug, 08:34 am
Delhi HC to hear on Sep 2 India Kanoon's pleas against single judge's 'right to be forgotten' order
  • 2
    indianexpress19 Aug, 09:22 am
    Name-based searches on legal databases in 'public interest': Delhi High Court
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Supreme Court of IndiaDelhi High Court
    Corporate
    Google LLCIKanoon Software Development Private Limited
    Judiciary
    Supreme Court of IndiaDelhi High Court

    Story context

    Category
    Politics
    Location
    India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    19 Aug 2026
    Key entities
    Public interestDelhi High CourtIndiaSenior counselWritSearch engineHarshad MehtaSupreme Court of CanadaDelhiDivision benchCensurePrima facie