Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Supreme Court Rejects Plea Challenging Provisions of SC ST Act and 2018 Amendment

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Challenging Provisions of SC ST Act and 2018 Amendment

Analysed 22 Sept 2026·6 sources analysed·Maharashtra, India·Politics
Supreme Court Rejects Plea Challenging Provisions of SC ST Act and 2018 AmendmentPreviousNext

The Supreme Court dismissed a plea challenging the constitutional validity of provisions in the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, including the 2018 amendment that removed preliminary inquiry requirements and reinstated restrictions on anticipatory bail. The petitioner argued these provisions could lead to misuse, arbitrary arrests, and reverse discrimination, citing concerns over compensation distribution. The court referred to its 2020 ruling upholding the amendments and stated sufficient safeguards exist against misuse, declining to revisit the issue.

Sentiment
51%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (51/100). Lens Score 54/100.

Outlets measured: indiatoday, english. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 22 Sept 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (51/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–50/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

english broke this story on 22 Sept, 10:30 am. Other outlets followed.

22 Sept, 10:30 am2 sources · 15 min22 Sept, 10:45 am
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byPrajakta Kale· Political Analyst· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Rajya Sabha By-Election for Koel Mallick's Vacant Seat Scheduled for October 16
Next →
Tamil Nadu's Proposed Pattinapakkam Secretariat Faces Legal and Community Opposition
1
english22 Sept, 10:30 am
SC Declines Plea Challenging SC ST Act Provisions, Says Safeguards Exist For Accused
  • 2
    indiatoday22 Sept, 10:45 am
    Enough safeguards in place: SC rejects plea challenging provisions of SC ST Act
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Supreme Court of IndiaParliament of India
    Judiciary
    Supreme Court of India

    Story context

    Category
    Politics
    Location
    Maharashtra, India
    Sources analysed
    6
    Last analysed
    22 Sept 2026
    Key entities
    Scheduled Castes and Scheduled TribesScheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989Supreme Court of IndiaFirst information reportJainismCroreIndian rupeeDominion of IndiaMaharashtraReverse discriminationSuryaBar (law)