Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Journalist Moves Supreme Court Over Police Request for Digital Footprint in Donation Case

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics

Journalist Moves Supreme Court Over Police Request for Digital Footprint in Donation Case

Analysed 1 Sept 2026·2 sources analysed·Ayodhya, India·Politics
Journalist Moves Supreme Court Over Police Request for Digital Footprint in Donation CasePreviousNext

Journalist Abhishek Upadhyay approached the Supreme Court on September 1, 2026, alleging that Uttar Pradesh Police sought his digital footprint from June 1, 2026, to identify sources related to his reporting on alleged misappropriation of Ayodhya Ram Temple donations. His counsel argued this request, linked to a road rage FIR from August 18, 2026, was an attempt to harass and expose journalistic sources. The Supreme Court acknowledged prior protection against coercive action and indicated it would review the matter while allowing the police to continue their investigation.

Sentiment
36%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is negative (36/100). Lens Score 66/100.

Outlets measured: thetribune, thehindu. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 1 Sept 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Negative (36/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (35–38/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

thehindu broke this story on 1 Sept, 06:48 am. Other outlets followed.

1 Sept, 06:48 am2 sources · 46 min1 Sept, 07:34 am
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byPrajakta Kale· Political Analyst· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Revanth Reddy Demands KCR's Resignation Amid Political Dispute in Telangana
Next →
Odisha CM Launches 593 Urban Projects and Announces Rs 560 Crore Package for New Councils
1
thehindu1 Sept, 06:48 am
Journalist tells SC that U.P. Police seeking digital footprint to dig out his Ram Temple donation case sources
  • 2
    thetribune1 Sept, 07:34 am
    Journalist who reported on Ayodhya temple donation theft moves SC over police seeking his digital footprint - The Tribune
  • Accountability flags

    TBN's analysis identified the following accountability dimensions in this story.

    • abuse of power

      This story involves alleged misuse of official authority or institutional position to achieve personal or political ends.

    • cover up attempted

      This story involves evidence of information being withheld, records altered, or facts suppressed by the parties involved.

    • rights violation

      This story involves alleged violations of constitutional or human rights — freedom of expression, due process, custodial rights, minority rights.

    Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Supreme Court of IndiaUttar Pradesh GovernmentGhaziabad PoliceUttar Pradesh Police
    Enforcement
    Ghaziabad PoliceUttar Pradesh Police
    Judiciary
    Supreme Court of India

    Story context

    Category
    Politics
    Location
    Ayodhya, India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    1 Sept 2026
    Key entities
    First information reportTempleJournalistIndependent politicianUttar Pradesh PoliceSuryaChief Justice of IndiaDalitStates and union territories of IndiaAyodhyaRoad rageCoercion