Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
UP Judge Questions Legality of Recalling 97 Part-Heard Cases from His Court

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics

UP Judge Questions Legality of Recalling 97 Part-Heard Cases from His Court

Analysed 18 Sept 2026·2 sources analysed·Uttar Pradesh, India·Politics
UP Judge Questions Legality of Recalling 97 Part-Heard Cases from His CourtPreviousNext

Uttar Pradesh judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar challenged the recall of 97 part-heard serious criminal cases from his court, calling the orders issued by the then District Judge Muzaffarnagar "without jurisdiction." The cases were recalled days after Diwakar awarded 22 death sentences in 10 cases. He questioned the legal authority of administrative orders recalling part-heard cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing judicial transparency and the limits of administrative power within the judiciary.

Sentiment
45%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (45/100). Lens Score 57/100.

Outlets measured: thestatesman, indianexpress. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 18 Sept 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (45/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (38–52/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

indianexpress broke this story on 18 Sept, 06:35 am. Other outlets followed.

18 Sept, 06:35 am2 sources · 62 min18 Sept, 07:37 am
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byPrajakta Kale· Political Analyst· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat Highlights 'Dharm' at Yuva Dharm Sansad in Ujjain
Next →
Odisha Junior Teachers Protest Demanding Job Regularisation and Court Stay Lift
1
indianexpress18 Sept, 06:35 am
'Recalling 97 murder cases from me illegal': UP judge who gave 23 death sentences
  • 2
    thestatesman18 Sept, 07:37 am
    'Where will the judge go?' UP judge questions recall of 97 part-heard cases
  • Accountability flags

    TBN's analysis identified the following accountability dimensions in this story.

    • abuse of power

      This story involves alleged misuse of official authority or institutional position to achieve personal or political ends.

    Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Additional District and Sessions Court of Uttar PradeshDistrict Court of MuzaffarnagarMuzaffarnagar District CourtAllahabad High CourtUttar Pradesh Judicial Service
    Judiciary
    Muzaffarnagar District CourtFast Track Court No. 3 MuzaffarnagarAllahabad High CourtJudiciary of Uttar Pradesh

    Story context

    Category
    Politics
    Location
    Uttar Pradesh, India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    18 Sept 2026
    Key entities
    DistrictMurderJurisdictionUttar PradeshCapital punishmentMuzaffarnagarJudiciaryDiwakarCode of Criminal Procedure (India)Bar associationRecall electionMiscarriage of justice