Punjab and Haryana High Court Limits Adjournments, Imposes Rs 1.5 Lakh Costs on Litigants
The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that adjournments cannot be claimed as a right and are granted only to address genuine professional difficulties. Justice Parmod Goyal imposed Rs 1.5 lakh in costs on litigants who, despite 11 opportunities, failed to conclude their evidence in a possession suit. The court emphasized that adjournments serve justice, not the convenience of counsel, and criticized delays caused by counsel's late arrivals and repeated requests for postponements.
First-hand measurement across 2 sources
We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. Coverage leans balanced overall (Left 0%, Centre 100%, Right 0%). Overall sentiment is neutral (52/100). Lens Score 34/100 — low public interest.
Outlets analysed (first-hand measurement by TBN's Bias Engine):
- thetribune— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
- thetribune— balanced framing, neutral sentiment
AI Analysis
The articles present a judicial perspective emphasizing procedural discipline without political framing. The focus is on court rulings and legal standards, reflecting a neutral stance centered on judicial administration. There is no evident political bias, as the coverage strictly reports the court's decisions and reasoning without partisan commentary.
The tone across the articles is formal and neutral, focusing on the court's enforcement of procedural norms. While the imposition of costs and criticism of counsel's conduct may be viewed negatively by affected parties, the overall sentiment is balanced, emphasizing fairness and the proper functioning of the judicial process.
How 2 sources covered this story
Each source's own headline, political lean, and sentiment — so you can see framing differences at a glance.