Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Supreme Court Ends Live Streaming of Case Mentioning in CJI Surya Kant's Court

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics

Supreme Court Ends Live Streaming of Case Mentioning in CJI Surya Kant's Court

Analysed 28 Oct 2026·2 sources analysed·New Delhi, India·Politics

The Supreme Court of India has stopped live streaming of case mentioning in Chief Justice Surya Kant's court. Mentioning allows lawyers or parties to request urgent hearings or early case listings. This decision follows the CJI's criticism of lawyers making mentions without clear issues, calling it a nuisance. Additionally, from November 2, senior lawyers will no longer be allowed to make oral mentions, with junior counsels encouraged to do so instead, according to a court circular.

Sentiment
50%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (50/100). Lens Score 47/100.

Outlets measured: news18, news18. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 28 Oct 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (50/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–50/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

news18 broke this story on 28 Oct, 07:32 am. Other outlets followed.

28 Oct, 07:32 am2 sources · 0 min28 Oct, 07:32 am
  1. 1
    news1828 Oct, 07:32 am
    Live streaming of case mentioning in CJI's court closed
  2. 2
    news1828 Oct, 07:32 am
    Live streaming of case mentioning in CJI's court closed

Who's involved

Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

Government
Supreme Court of India
Political
Indian National Congress
Judiciary
Supreme Court of India

Story context

Category
Politics
Location
New Delhi, India
Sources analysed
2
Last analysed
28 Oct 2026
Key entities
Chief Justice of IndiaStreaming mediaSupreme Court of IndiaSurya Kant (judge)New DelhiProcedural lawRahul GandhiLawyerUnited States CongressIndependent politicianPress Trust of India
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byPrajakta Kale· Political Analyst· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Maharashtra Reports Higher MoU Conversion Rate, Highlights Investment Incentive Practices
Next →
42nd Amendment's Impact on Federalism and Calls to Revive Inter-State Council