Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
Indian Copyright Office Rules AI System Cannot Be Legal Author of Artwork

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Technology

Indian Copyright Office Rules AI System Cannot Be Legal Author of Artwork

Analysed 1 Sept 2026·2 sources analysed·India·Technology
Indian Copyright Office Rules AI System Cannot Be Legal Author of ArtworkPreviousNext

India's Copyright Office ruled that an AI system, DABUS, cannot be recognized as the legal author of a work under Indian copyright law, which requires human authorship. The decision followed an application by US researcher Stephen Thaler, who sought copyright registration for artwork generated by DABUS. While the artwork met the originality criteria, the Office held that Thaler, who created and configured DABUS, is the legal author since the law attributes authorship to a person who causes the work's creation.

Sentiment
52%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 2 sources

We measured how 2 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (52/100). Lens Score 47/100.

Outlets measured: businessstandard, indianexpress. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 2 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 1 Sept 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (52/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (52–52/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

indianexpress broke this story on 1 Sept, 06:06 am. Other outlets followed.

1 Sept, 06:06 am2 sources · 8 h1 Sept, 01:47 pm
  1. 1
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byAshwin Alsi· Technology Editor· editorial standards byOjas Kale
← Previous
Studies Show Reflective Roofing Materials Reduce Cooling Energy Use
Next →
Oppex AI Raises Rs 4.2 Crore in Pre-Seed Round from Info Edge Ventures
indianexpress1 Sept, 06:06 am
AI can create original work but can't be its author, Copyright Office holds
  • 2
    businessstandard1 Sept, 01:47 pm
    Copyright Office rejects AI system DABUS as author under Indian law
  • Who's involved

    Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

    Government
    Office of the Registrar of CopyrightsDelhi High CourtCopyright OfficeMinistry of Commerce and Industry
    Judiciary
    Delhi High Court

    Story context

    Category
    Tech
    Location
    India
    Sources analysed
    2
    Last analysed
    1 Sept 2026
    Key entities
    DABUSUnited States Copyright OfficeArtificial intelligenceCopyright Act of 1976OpenAILinguisticsSentienceAutonomyIndiaComputationComputer-generated imageryDelhi High Court