Skip to content
Get the Balanced News app for a better experience!
The Balanced News Logo
Analytics
The Balanced News Logo

Stay Balanced, Stay Informed

Menu
  • Browse News
  • Underreported Stories
  • Curated Feeds
  • Insights
  • Analytics
  • Our Writers
  • About Us
  • Download App
Learn
  • How It Works
  • Bias Detection
  • Lens Score
  • Source Bias Checker
  • Accountability
  • Custom Feeds
Newsroom
  • Writers & Analysts
  • About TBN
  • Editorial Standards
  • Corrections Policy
  • Our Partners
  • Insights
Socials
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
News Categories
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Science
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • International
  • Good News
  • Crypto

Get Our App

Available for iOS and Android


LensFeedsInsightsAnalyticsTrendingGood NewsSportsPoliticsBusinessCrimeTechEntertainmentHealthNationalInternational

© 2026 The Balanced News. All rights reserved.

About UsEditorial StandardsCorrectionsHelp & SupportPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
High Courts Uphold Divorces Citing Mental Cruelty and Grant Alimony

Categories

Categories

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

Related Coverage

Select a news story to see related coverage from other media outlets.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. General

High Courts Uphold Divorces Citing Mental Cruelty and Grant Alimony

Analysed 23 Oct 2026·3 sources analysed·Patna, India·General
High Courts Uphold Divorces Citing Mental Cruelty and Grant AlimonyPreviousNext

The Patna and Rajasthan High Courts recently upheld divorces citing mental cruelty in marital disputes. The Patna High Court recognized 'reciprocal cruelty' where spouses refuse to live together, granting the wife Rs 36.25 lakh in permanent alimony. The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a wife's prolonged refusal of intimacy without valid reason constitutes cruelty, supporting the husband's divorce. Both cases involved contested allegations of mistreatment and refusal to cohabit, with courts emphasizing the breakdown of marital adjustment as grounds for divorce.

Sentiment
50%
TBN's observations

First-hand measurement across 3 sources

We measured how 3 outlets covered this story. No outlet gave this story a measurable political slant — there is no left–right reading to report. Overall sentiment is neutral (50/100). Lens Score 40/100.

Outlets measured: indianexpress, indianexpress, economictimes. See how each one headlined and framed the same story in the source comparison below.

AI analysis of 3 sources · Published under editorial oversight by The Balanced News
Analysed 23 Oct 2026· How this analysis is produced· Editorial standards· Corrections

AI Analysis

Sentiment — Neutral (50/100)

Sentiment was consistent across outlets (50–50/100), indicating broadly factual reporting rather than editorialising.

Coverage timeline

economictimes broke this story on 22 Oct, 09:24 am. Other outlets followed.

22 Oct, 09:24 am3 sources · 21 h23 Oct, 06:37 am
AI analysis by the TBN Bias Engine · beat methodology byOjas Kale· Founder & Editor
← Previous
Magnitude 3.0 Earthquake Recorded Near Doddaballapur in Bengaluru Rural
Next →
Kerala Suvarna Keralam SK-74 Lottery Draw Scheduled for October 23, 2026
  1. 1
    economictimes22 Oct, 09:24 am
    Husband wins divorce case but ordered to pay Rs 36.25 lakh to wife: How Patna HC applied Hindu marriage law on cruelty and permanent alimony
  2. 2
    indianexpress22 Oct, 12:21 pm
    Wife's prolonged refusal of intimacy is cruelty: Rajasthan High Court backs divorce
  3. 3
    indianexpress23 Oct, 06:37 am
    'Reciprocal cruelty': Patna High Court backs divorce, grants Rs 36 lakh alimony to wife

Who's involved

Institutions and figures named across source coverage.

Government
Patna High CourtRajasthan High Court
Judiciary
Patna High CourtRajasthan High Court

Story context

Category
Generic
Location
Patna, India
Sources analysed
3
Last analysed
23 Oct 2026
Key entities
DivorceFamily courtPatna High CourtLakhIndian rupeeAlimonySupreme courtPatnaRana dynastyIrreconcilable differencesDesertionRajasthan High Court