Cricket journalism in India is passionate - sometimes too passionate. Mumbai media covers MI differently than how Chennai media covers CSK. Some journalists are known Kohli fans, others prefer Rohit. Controversial umpiring decisions get wildly different takes. The Balanced News shows you all perspectives by aggregating 50+ cricket sources and using AI to reveal how the same story is framed differently across outlets.
Cricket in India isn't just a sport — it's a cultural phenomenon that generates media coverage rivaling political news. But cricket journalism has its own bias ecosystem that most fans never examine. IPL team ownership creates coverage conflicts (Ambani owns MI and Network18 media). BCCI's advertising budget influences which outlets get access and how critical their coverage can be. Regional loyalties mean Mumbai media covers MI more favorably than CSK, and Chennai media does the opposite.
Player coverage follows celebrity patterns rather than analytical journalism. Certain cricketers receive consistently positive coverage across most outlets (often correlating with endorsement deals), while others face disproportionate scrutiny. Selection controversies are framed differently by outlets with different regional and political alignments — a player's state of origin can predict which outlets will support their inclusion or exclusion.
The BCCI — cricket's governing body in India and the world's richest cricket board — maintains enormous influence over cricket media. Outlets that criticize BCCI governance face access restrictions for matches, press conferences, and exclusive interviews. This creates a systematic softening of coverage that fans rarely recognize.
International cricket coverage in Indian media carries strong nationalistic bias. Losses are analyzed differently than wins. Umpiring decisions against India receive dramatically more coverage than those in India's favor. Tour coverage focuses on Indian performances while underreporting opponents' perspectives.
The Balanced News helps cricket fans see past these patterns by comparing specialized cricket outlets, general sports media, and regional coverage side by side with bias detection.
If you follow cricket closely, you've noticed how the same match generates different narratives across outlets. Our multi-source approach shows you the complete picture — from IPL franchise politics to international tour controversies.
IPL, World Cup, Asia Cup, domestic cricket, women's cricket - everything in one place
See how Mumbai outlets cover MI differently than Chennai outlets cover CSK
Cricbuzz, ESPNcricinfo, Times of India, Sportstar, regional outlets - all compared
Compare how different media covers Kohli, Rohit, Dhoni - spot the bias
Find underreported cricket stories that mainstream sports media ignores
Cricket news in Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati, Tamil, Telugu, Bengali, English
When an IPL controversy breaks — a player auction dispute, a franchise ownership issue, or a match officiating controversy — coverage varies dramatically based on franchise connections and broadcasting partnerships. Outlets connected to MI's owner cover the story differently than independent sports journalists.
On The Balanced News, you see specialized cricket outlets (ESPNcricinfo, Cricbuzz), general news outlets (Times of India, NDTV), and regional media all covering the same controversy. Bias scores reveal which coverage is analytical and which is shaped by commercial relationships. The full picture emerges only through comparison.